 |
Agendas & Minutes |
|
Minutes - Planning Committee - 24 November 2010 |
This page was last updated on
Friday, December 17, 2010
|
|
| Present: |
Mr M Abbott, Mr G Bisson and Mrs A Butcher.
|
In Attendance: |
Mrs M Weston, Clerk to the Council
Two members of the public (part of the meeting) |
| Apologies for Absence: |
Mr J Charlesworth, Mrs H Klaassen, Mr M Rollé and Mrs P Wyeth
|
|
Declarations of Interest:
|
None
|
Minutes of Previous Meeting:
The Minutes of the Meetings of the Committee held on 26 October 2010 were signed as a true and accurate record. |
| |
| Matters Arising: |
|
NF NPA Status |
| |
|
|
Application No 94530 – Coxlease School, Clay Hill
Extension; new glazed canopy and re-roofing/repairs of Listed Building (Application for Listed Building Consent) |
|
No decision |
| |
|
|
Application No 95478 – Coxlease School
New teaching and staff accommodation; removal of temporary clad structures (revised design to PP 94802) |
|
Granted |
| |
|
|
Application No 95590 – 60 Wellands Road
Extension, roof conversion, new dormer, new porch |
|
Granted |
| |
|
|
Application No 95601 – South View Guest House, Gosport Lane
Erection of 5 x 2 bed flats and 1 x 2 bed, 1 x 3 bed bungalow (semi detached). Proposal is within the same bulk, mass and design and looks to change the mix |
|
No decision |
| |
|
|
Application No 95649 – 4 Northerwood Avenue
Single storey side and rear extension; decking; new vehicular access |
|
Granted |
| |
|
|
| Application No 95671 – Parkdale Cottage, Beaulieu Road
New pitched roof to outbuilding |
|
No decision |
| |
|
|
| Application No 95674 – Stydd Close, Shrubbs Hill Road Single storey rear extension (Application for Listed Building Consent) |
|
Granted |
| |
|
|
| Application No 95674 – Stydd Close, Shrubbs Hill Road
Single storey rear extension |
|
Granted |
| |
|
|
Application No 95683 – Lilac Cottage, Bank
Conservatory |
|
No decision |
| |
|
|
Application No 95694 – 38-40 High Street
One fascia sign with external illumination, one projecting sign
(Application for Advertisement Consent) |
|
No decision |
| |
|
|
Application No 95696 – 2 Bank Cottages
Two storey extension; relocate porch; single storey rear extension; conservatory |
|
No decision |
| |
|
|
Application No 95733 – 30 Queens Road
Conservatory (demolition of existing) |
|
No decision |
| |
|
|
Application No 95744 – Willow Cottage, Bank
Add conservation roof lights and convert loft to form bedroom and shower
room. Add French doors to lounge. Add French doors, windows and
light lantern to dining room. Form small enclosure for oil fired boiler |
|
No decision |
| |
|
|
Application No 95773 – 43 Hillary Close
Two storey extension to the rear |
|
No decision |
|
| |
Applications for the Committee’s consideration:-
|
Application No 95663 – 10 Park Close, Clay Hill
Garage building |
RESOLVED: To recommend that permission be granted. The proposals use the existing access and do not detract from the street scene. It is noted that there is room for a vehicle to turn within the site.
|
| |
Application No 95665 – Land adj 10 Park Close, Clay Hill
Outline application for two storey office building (existing building to be demolished). Principle and access, appearance, layout and scale to be considered. |
| RESOLVED: To recommend refusal but to accept the decision reached by the NFNPA’s offices under delegated powers. The proposal to tidy the area is welcomed but would prefer to see a residential use in the same way as neighbouring properties. The proposals were not considered to fit the street scene and it is recognised that there has been no commercial use for many years. |
| |
Application No 95763 – 1 Park Close
First floor extension |
RESOLVED: To recommend that permission be granted. The proposals enhance the building and add to a family home with modern standards.
|
| |
Application No 95764 – Spellow Dale, Gosport Lane
Single storey rear extension |
| RESOLVED: To recommend that permission be granted but to accept the decision reached by the NFNPA’s officers under delegated powers. The proposal does not affect the street scene and there are no known adverse neighbour objections. |
| |
Application No 95836 – 13 High Street
New office/studio for commercial use in place of existing builders shed |
| RESOLVED: To recommend that permission be granted but to accept the decision reached by the NFNPA’s officers under delegated powers. A stipulation should be that the building should only be for office use. The proposals tidy the site. |
| |
Application No 95887 – Site of Springwood Cottage, Gritnam Road, Bank
Replacement dwelling (demolition of existing) resiting of vehicular access |
RESOLVED: To recommend that permission be granted. The proposals tidy up a mismatch of construction styles and enhance the street scene. This will provide a good family home and enhance the amenity of the community. There is neighbour support on both sides and it is recognised that the proposals will enhance their amenity. The slight movement from the existing footprint will allow future maintenance. There are no apparent highway issues with the new access. All major trees on site will be retained. It is felt that this application should be dealt with under current, not emerging, policies as applicants have been working with the NFNPA officers since 2007/2008. The applicants have lived in the existing dwelling for five years and have no intention of moving.
|
| |
Application No 95893 – Site of Springwood Cottage, Gritnam Road, Bank
Demolition of dwelling (application for Conservation Area Consent) |
RESOLVED: To recommend that permission be granted. The proposals tidy up a mismatch of construction styles and enhance the street scene. This will provide a good family home and enhance the amenity of the community.
There is neighbour support on both sides and it is recognised that the proposals will enhance their amenity. The slight movement from the existing footprint will allow future maintenance. There are no apparent highway issues with the new access. All major trees on site will be retained. It is felt that this application should be dealt with under current, not emerging, policies as applicants have been working with the NFNPA officers since 2007/2008. The applicants have lived in the existing dwelling for five years and have no intention of moving.
|
| |
Application No 95920 – Linwood, Princes Crescent
Pair of three storey semi detached houses (application for new PP to replace An extant PP – now in extended Conservation Area)
|
| RESOLVED: To recommend that permission be granted. The Parish Council were happy with the previous planning applications and comments made then still apply. |
| |
Application No 95922 – 34 Shaggs Meadow
Two storey rear extension and replacement garage
|
RESOLVED: To recommend that permission be granted. There is sufficient screening not to affect the amenity of neighbouring properties. The owner of No 32 is happy with the proposal.
|
| |
| Any Other Business:- |
Treework applications entered since the date of the last meeting:
|
| |
Application No CONS/10/0383 – 17 Forest Gardens
T1 – fell Western Red Cedar
T2 –reduce Western Red Cedar in height 2M |
| |
Treework applications decided since the date of the last meeting :- |
Application No CONS/10/0342 - Littlecroft, Emery Down
T1 – fell Sycamore. T2 – crown lift Yew to 10 ft - Raise no objections
|
| |
Application No CONS/10/0360 – 10 Empress Road
Fell 1 Norwegian Spruce - Raise no objections
|
| |
Application No TPO/10/0349 – Holmfield, 103 High Street
T3 – reduce large lateral limbs (Westside and eastside) and crown thin by 25% - Granted
|
|
| Appeals lodged against enforcement notices since the date of the last meeting: |
No APP/B9506/D/10/2139912 – 1 Alum Green View, Gritnam Road, Bank
Retention of solar panel (amended description) |
| |
In the absence of any other business the Chairman of the Planning Committee thanked those present for attending and closed the meeting.
Chairman
Date |
| |
Related Internal Links: |
|
Related
Internet Links:
|
|
Most of the pages within the
Lyndhurst Parish Council website include links to external websites.
These links are included to give you the opportunity to explore
an issue in more depth. Lyndhurst Parish Council is not responsible
for the content of any external internet sites. |
